Updated information / link to register for the meeting.
|
![]() |
| Note - photo above is not the actual rendering for the bridge currently in design. |
South Dade Updates. My best method for keeping everyone up to date on important matters affecting our community.
Updated information / link to register for the meeting.
|
![]() |
| Note - photo above is not the actual rendering for the bridge currently in design. |
She was warned. "Nevertheless, she persisted" and now we have to wonder who called the ‘Code Red’ on Council Woman Marsha Matson? Dr. Matson believes that we, the people, can handle the truth and wants affected residents to be included in the process, rather than merely voicing ok or objections after the proposed Interlocal agreement is a 'done deal'.
Dr. Matson should have seen it coming. After all, she revealed that the Manager advised her that her fellow council members were angry with her (CLICK HERE to read her e-mail or CLICK HERE to read the transcript of her appearance with Michael Miller of the Community Newspapers ). Was it speculation or fear? Regardless that anger played out in the late hours of the October village council meeting when she was at the receiving end of what appeared to many to be a “Code Red” – a beat down for daring to break an unwritten chain of command in requesting a legitimate and interactive town hall meeting. (There is no such chain of command, by the way. Members of the Village Council always had access to the public through scheduled Town Hall meetings - that it until now, or so it seems)What’s a Code Red? When many people hear the term "code red," they immediately think of the popular movie A Few Good Men.
As portrayed in that movie, a "Code Red" refers to a form of extrajudicial punishment — a type of punishment that’s carried out without a court’s oversight or any form of legal approval. The code red was a major plot point of the 1992 film A Few Good Men, where a character dies after receiving a code red. In the movie, the motive for the “Code Red” was retaliation for the young Marine violating an order of silence of the commanding officer. Hmmm, that sounds familiar as some suspect that motive for the October council meeting beat down was anger by 3 of the 4 other council members over Dr. Matson violating an unwritten rule of silence as to the bridge negotiation. How you might ask? By daring to ask for a public noticed, publicly held meeting where the veil of silence would be lifted on the 87 avenue bridge fiasco and, (horrors!) the affected residents would actually have input on what happens to street within Palmetto Bay before it is voted on. Dr. Matson's plans were not for mere comments, but an actual live forum with give and take interaction. You know, how town hall meetings were held prior to this current mayor and council.
But Noooooooo. The decorum really went out the window that night as council members took their turns voicing their displeasure at Dr. Matson. This should not have occurred. Read the decorum rules.
The decorum rules are simple. Really, a dignified council should be able to adhere to Village Code 2-45 concerning Decorum:
All
speakers must address their remarks to the mayor, speak in a dignified and
courteous manner, and avoid admonishing
individual members of the public, council and representatives of the village.
(bold emphasis added)
Fellow residents reached out to me who were embarrassed by how Council Woman Matson was treated. One specifically asked me "What do you think about Marsha’s treatment at the council meeting Monday night? Council comments especially”
What do I think? In my opinion, it was shameful, unbecoming and textbook examples of blatant violations of the decorum ordinance. As Mayor, I championed both the original decorum ordinance as well as an update that was attached to each and every agenda. Currently published with each agenda is the following statement that all members of the village council agree to abide to:
WE,
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY, HEREBY COMMIT OURSELVES TO
MAINTAINING CIVILITY IN OUR PUBLIC AND POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND PLEDGE TO THE
FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES:
•
We will respect the right of all citizens in our community to hold different
opinions;
•
We will avoid rhetoric intended to
humiliate or question the wisdom of those whose opinions are different from
ours;
•
We will strive to understand differing
perspectives;
• We will choose our words carefully;
•
We will speak truthfully without accusation
and we will avoid distortion;
•
We will speak out against violence, prejudice, and incivility in all of their
forms, whenever and wherever they occur.
(bold emphasis added)
These words have become meaningless under the current mayor and village council who engage in what can only be termed as shameful behavior directly and through proxies. Examples exceed the apparent code red beat down of their own, Dr. Matson, at the regular council meeting. Examples include juvenile attempts to give cute little code or nicknames to those who disagree with them, even publishing a strangely irrelevant video actually played as part of an official council meeting. This really is one of those ‘you can’t make this stuff up’ moments. Members of this council, under this current mayor, often act as wannabe elementary school yard bullies. This is all yet another in a long series of events where they say one thing that sounds great, but act otherwise in defiance – an ultimate act of passive aggressiveness.
Private meetings held, not open to the average resident. Interesting note: Another thing I learned from watching the video is that the current mayor has been talking to a select few (one family was identified), who also were her main campaign supporters. This begs the question, why not include everyone? This is one goal achieved through Dr. Matson's request for a town hall, everyone has an equal chance to be heard rather than those village insiders who have special relationships and special access to the mayor. Can we have a list of those meetings as well as the substance of what was discussed or agreed to? I'm betting that this disclosure wont happen)
Though I have a long history of disagreements with Dr. Matson; I do also share items of agreement with her. Keep persisting Dr. Matson. It will take a change in mayor and at least 2 members of this village council, but the fight to restore transparency will eventually succeed.
My personal message to Dr. Marsha Matson, Council Member, District 3: Transparency and good governance in Palmetto Bay is a worthy fight. Don’t fear their angry words, proxy email attacks, or their juvenile attack videos or characters.
I also want to thank Patrick Fiore, Council Member, District One, who was the lone ally for transparency, who stood with Dr. Matson that night. He too believes that this is an issue of great public importance where residents should be a part of, not excluded from the substantive discussions of this process.
When did it become a rule that elected members of the Village Council cannot hold a town hall meeting? This is outrageous. There was a time that Palmetto Bay was known for its Town Hall meetings and public access. My blog list 50 entries for blog posts involving Town Hall meetings (CLICK HERE to view a link to the 50 articles).
I speak as one of the founders of the Village of Palmetto Bay, as well as having the honor of serving as Mayor for 12 years, in stating that Dr. Matson has the right – and all members of the Village Council have the responsibility – to engage our fellow residents in town hall and other public meetings. A critical purpose of town hall meetings is for officials to hear the community's views on issues of public importance. Residents have the right to hear from their officials as well as address them in a public setting.
Who authorized the current mayor and manager to shut down town hall meetings? I missed any resolution or other official action implementing such a policy against transparency.
There have been no specific rules or guidelines for holding a town hall meeting and certainly there are no bars within the Village Charter or any ordinances to holding such meetings.
There should have been, and there should be, town hall meetings on topics including the ongoing 87 avenue bridge issue (the negotiations on the interlocal agreement), the 136 Street multi-path, budgets and so many other issues.
I am shocked and dismayed at the level of bickering and lack of civility that is ongoing within the current Palmetto Bay administration – I have reviewed the email of Dr. Marsha Matson, Council Member, District 3. I simply cannot understand why she has been cornered into this situation.
The behavior and resistance detailed in the email is unfortunately consistent with other behavior of this administration, led by the current mayor and village council members. I have 250 articles posted relating to transparency, many critical of what I view as a total lack of information available to the residents, not only in terms of public Town Hall meetings, but also being shut out to access to public records.
This government in sorely lacking in transparency, openness and accessibility when residents don't have access to the most basic information on what is going on in the Village and what the Council is doing.
A simple view of the Village Agenda Center demonstrates that NO meeting minutes, not a single set for minutes, has been posted online for any Village Council meeting held in 2021, 2020 and only four (4) for the meetings held in 2019. These meetings are limited to: January 7, 2019, 2 sets for the regular council meeting as well as the special council meeting of February 4, 2019, and May 21 (all not posted until November 5, by the way).
I have stated that transparency is dead in Palmetto Bay. Council Member Dr. Matson provides even greater insight as to how far this Village has sunk in withholding information and public access from residents.
Palmetto Bay residents should have full access to information. It is time for a movement to return to a transparent and accessible government in Palmetto Bay.
| The list of the 21 applications for TAP funding in the 2019 cycle |
IMPORTANT MEETING REGARDING THE PROPOSED 87TH AV BRIDGE
I have registered, have you? Members of the public may participate virtually and/or watch the virtual meeting via the Village’s official Facebook page and/or our Granicus web stream on www.palmettobay-fl.gov. This publicly noticed sunshine meeting will be recorded.
Please register to attend the session as follows: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4755197987539689232 After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
CLICK HERE to view the official online notice.
I attended the virtual meeting held Thursday evening, November 19, 2020. As I have stated, the virtual meetings are a boon, not a hindrance to public participation. Dragging people down to one physician location is so 2019. Virtual meetings are a tool that I wish I had available prior to 2018. Look to the numbers posted below. 421 people attended and participated - and everyone had a great view and could control the volume from where there were sitting.
Miami-Dade County is doing a great job promoting public participation through the virtual meetings.
Here is a short update:
624 people registered for this virtual meeting
421 actually attended (a number that would overwhelm most physician meeting locations)
242 participated via smart phone poll
209 individual questions proffered and the numbers continue to grow
85% Responded that the plan is generally on the right track
13% Responded "Maybe" to the question as to 'is the plan generally on the right track?'
You can still participate! CLICK HERE for access to the tools pictured below:
The purpose of the Ludlam Trail is to provide a new shared-use trail in Miami-Dade County that will include safe, dedicated, direct pathways for walking, running, and cycling; to encourage active lifestyles and the use of green, non-motorized modes of transportation; and to enhance overall connectivity and accessibility between schools, parks, transit stops and residences, workplaces and shopping.
The proposed project supports the vision to provide an interconnected trail system offering transportation alternatives and reducing traffic congestion for a livable, sustainable County. Ludlam Trail will be a vital component of a seamless network of future greenway trails and water trails connecting to the Metrorail Dadeland North Station to the south and to other planned trails including The Underline/East Coast Greenway, South Dade Trail, Snapper Creek Trail, East/West Trail and Merrick Trail. It will enhance mobility and strengthen connections to neighboring communities, providing increased opportunities for economic development.
REMINDER - MEETING IS SET FOR THURSDAY - Nov. 19 6 PM. Attend from the comfort of your home or from wherever best suits you.
Engage. Participate. Important public meeting is set and you can attend from the comfort of your home or office! No travel required.
The LUDLAM TRAIL will be a 5.6-mile, iconic greenway with paths for biking, walking, and running, connecting the heart of Miami-Dade. The trail will link schools, parks, transit, homes, workplaces and spots to shop & dine.
The land was recently purchased by Miami-Dade County; a Project Development & Environment study and design of the trail are now underway. Stretching north-south from Robert King High Park to Downtown Kendall, this trail will form part of the “Miami Loop” in the county’s network of bikeways, along with the Underline.
(CLICK HERE) to view the Public Information Meeting as well as the Ludlum Trail Corridor PD&E Study Virtual Public Meeting Invitation (2 pages of .PDF) where more information is available as well as how to register and participate in the virtual meeting.
Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces is performing a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the 5.6-mile-long Ludlam Trail Corridor from SW 80th Street to 400 feet north of NW 7th Street, generally following the north-south alignment of what would be NW/SW 69th Avenue, within the former Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway right-of-way. The project is located in unincorporated Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami, Florida.
The purpose of the Ludlam Trail is to provide a new shared-use trail in Miami-Dade County that will include safe, dedicated, direct pathways for walking, running, and cycling; to encourage active lifestyles and the use of green, non-motorized modes of transportation; and to enhance overall connectivity and accessibility between schools, parks, transit stops and residences, workplaces and shopping.
The proposed project supports the vision to provide an interconnected trail system offering transportation alternatives and reducing traffic congestion for a livable, sustainable County. Ludlam Trail will be a vital component of a seamless network of future greenway trails and water trails connecting to the Metrorail Dadeland North Station to the south and to other planned trails including The Underline/East Coast Greenway, South Dade Trail, Snapper Creek Trail, East/West Trail and Merrick Trail. It will enhance mobility and strengthen connections to neighboring communities, providing increased opportunities for economic development.
Join our PD&E Virtual Public Information Meeting on Thursday, Nov. 19 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Ludlam Trail PD&E Fact Sheet
Ludlam Trail PD&E Virtual Meeting invitationLudlam Trail PD&E - Virtual Public Information MeetingThe Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces invites you to attend a Virtual Public Meeting regarding the proposed Ludlam Trail Corridor.
The virtual meeting will include a presentation of work in progress and include an interactive opportunity to ask questions and make suggestions about the project. This virtual meeting is being held to allow interested persons an opportunity to be informed about the proposed trail and provide comments. There will be a brief presentation at the beginning of the meeting starting at 6:15 pm.Nov 19, 2020 06:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Prior related posts - Ludlum Trail:
July 29, 2015, The Warren County Bike Trail - I contend that this is a model for the Ludlum Trail
October 4, 2019, NY Government for improved natural/recreational facilities. “DEC: Rail line should be deemed “interim trail”.
I hope to see you there!
Engage. Participate. Important public meeting is set and you can attend from the comfort of your home or office! No travel required.
The LUDLAM TRAIL will be a 5.6-mile, iconic greenway with paths for biking, walking, and running, connecting the heart of Miami-Dade. The trail will link schools, parks, transit, homes, workplaces and spots to shop & dine.
The land was recently purchased by Miami-Dade County; a Project Development & Environment study and design of the trail are now underway. Stretching north-south from Robert King High Park to Downtown Kendall, this trail will form part of the “Miami Loop” in the county’s network of bikeways, along with the Underline.
(CLICK HERE) to view the Public Information Meeting as well as the Ludlum Trail Corridor PD&E Study Virtual Public Meeting Invitation (2 pages of .PDF) where more information is available as well as how to register and participate in the virtual meeting.
Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces is performing a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the 5.6-mile-long Ludlam Trail Corridor from SW 80th Street to 400 feet north of NW 7th Street, generally following the north-south alignment of what would be NW/SW 69th Avenue, within the former Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway right-of-way. The project is located in unincorporated Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami, Florida.
The purpose of the Ludlam Trail is to provide a new shared-use trail in Miami-Dade County that will include safe, dedicated, direct pathways for walking, running, and cycling; to encourage active lifestyles and the use of green, non-motorized modes of transportation; and to enhance overall connectivity and accessibility between schools, parks, transit stops and residences, workplaces and shopping.
The proposed project supports the vision to provide an interconnected trail system offering transportation alternatives and reducing traffic congestion for a livable, sustainable County. Ludlam Trail will be a vital component of a seamless network of future greenway trails and water trails connecting to the Metrorail Dadeland North Station to the south and to other planned trails including The Underline/East Coast Greenway, South Dade Trail, Snapper Creek Trail, East/West Trail and Merrick Trail. It will enhance mobility and strengthen connections to neighboring communities, providing increased opportunities for economic development.
Join our PD&E Virtual Public Information Meeting on Thursday, Nov. 19 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Ludlam Trail PD&E Fact Sheet
Ludlam Trail PD&E Virtual Meeting invitationLudlam Trail PD&E - Virtual Public Information MeetingThe Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces invites you to attend a Virtual Public Meeting regarding the proposed Ludlam Trail Corridor.
The virtual meeting will include a presentation of work in progress and include an interactive opportunity to ask questions and make suggestions about the project. This virtual meeting is being held to allow interested persons an opportunity to be informed about the proposed trail and provide comments. There will be a brief presentation at the beginning of the meeting starting at 6:15 pm.Nov 19, 2020 06:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Prior related posts - Ludlum Trail:
July 29, 2015, The Warren County Bike Trail - I contend that this is a model for the Ludlum Trail
October 4, 2019, NY Government for improved natural/recreational facilities. “DEC: Rail line should be deemed “interim trail”.
I hope to see you there!
Note that I am proud to have sponsored Palmetto Bay Resolution 2015-05 (CLICK HERE), wherein the Village of Palmetto Bay officially expressed support for the development of the Ludlum Trail as a lineal park. This was a publicly discussed agenda item and received full support, a unanimous 5-0 vote of support.
The following information is taken verbatim from the official Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces website:
(CLICK HERE) to view the official page where more information is available as well as registering to participate in the virtual meeting.
Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces is performing a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the 5.6-mile-long Ludlam Trail Corridor from SW 80th Street to 400 feet north of NW 7th Street, generally following the north-south alignment of what would be NW/SW 69th Avenue, within the former Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway right-of-way. The project is located in unincorporated Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami, Florida.
The purpose of the Ludlam Trail is to provide a new shared-use trail in Miami-Dade County that will include safe, dedicated, direct pathways for walking, running, and cycling; to encourage active lifestyles and the use of green, non-motorized modes of transportation; and to enhance overall connectivity and accessibility between schools, parks, transit stops and residences, workplaces and shopping.
The proposed project supports the vision to provide an interconnected trail system offering transportation alternatives and reducing traffic congestion for a livable, sustainable County. Ludlam Trail will be a vital component of a seamless network of future greenway trails and water trails connecting to the Metrorail Dadeland North Station to the south and to other planned trails including The Underline/East Coast Greenway, South Dade Trail, Snapper Creek Trail, East/West Trail and Merrick Trail. It will enhance mobility and strengthen connections to neighboring communities, providing increased opportunities for economic development.
Join our PD&E Virtual Public Information Meeting on Thursday, Nov. 19 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Ludlam Trail PD&E Fact Sheet
Ludlam Trail PD&E Virtual Meeting invitationLudlam Trail PD&E - Virtual Public Information MeetingThe Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces invites you to attend a Virtual Public Meeting regarding the proposed Ludlam Trail Corridor.
The virtual meeting will include a presentation of work in progress and include an interactive opportunity to ask questions and make suggestions about the project. This virtual meeting is being held to allow interested persons an opportunity to be informed about the proposed trail and provide comments. There will be a brief presentation at the beginning of the meeting starting at 6:15 pm.Nov 19, 2020 06:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Prior related posts - Ludlum Trail:
July 29, 2015, The Warren County Bike Trail - I contend that this is a model for the Ludlum Trail
October 4, 2019, NY Government for improved natural/recreational facilities. “DEC: Rail line should be deemed “interim trail”.
| Will this be the future for the Palmetto Bay side of 136 Street? |
136th St. Improvement ProjectThis project is currently under design. Improvements include minor widening of the roadway to add bike lanes on both sides of the road and milling & resurfacing the existing roadway. We are looking to replace the existing 5’ sidewalk on the South side of SW 136TH Street (Village of Palmetto Bay Side) with a new 7’ wide sidewalk. Other improvements will include pavement markings, ADA Compliant pedestrian ramps, and landscape improvements. This is a LAP Project between Miami Dade County and FDOT, and Village of Pinecrest and Village of Palmetto Bay are also stakeholders.
| This rendering no longer represents the project as currently proposed |
Two meetings upcoming - one directed toward Pinecrest and the other held at the Palmetto Bay Village Hall. Why not hear from all residents at once? Will the information be the same?