I have been asked to provide more information regarding the
proposed multi-use trail, a possibility for Coral Reef Drive (and SW 184). I have posted page 16 of the draft study
below. Note this is limited to the multi-use trail, not the alternative plan if
protected bike lanes were installed. The protected bike lane alternative will
be the subject of a future post if there is interest from readers.
As indicated on page 16, for purposes of this study, Marlin
Engineering lists the design (and impact) of a multi-use trail as follows:
·
Standard width is 10 to 12-Feet, may be 8-Feet
in areas where space is restricted or if it is not heavily used.
·
Must be at least 6-Feet from roadway and have a
2-Foot clearance on each side.
(See below)
SPACE REQUIREMENT: That means total space dedicated to the Multi-Use
Trail would be 16 to 20 feet from the edge of the roadway [minimum 6 feet from
road, plus minimum 8 feet (where restricted) plus an additional 2 feet of
clearance from the edge of the path furthest from the street].
IMPORTANT ISSUES: The logical question here is whether there is sufficient
open right of way along Coral Reef Drive? I have previously identified
the numerous mature shade canopy trees as well as a historic coral rock wall in
many areas.
My issue is what trees will be destroyed for a project that
may not fit within the design parameters set by Marlin Engineering? Or would
the Coral Reef Multi-Path be forced to take the same type of modifications used
on SW 136 Street such as severe reductions or splitting the path in two to
allover for trees in a center median?
The discussion above leads to many fair questions to be
discussed when and if these proposals come before the mayor and village
council. That is, unless any changes would be handled administratively as
attempted (and, thankfully, denied) for the Palmetto Bay Village Center.
Applying the Marlin Engineering Design recommendations to
the actual 136 Street buildout:
Obviously the SW 136 Street Multi-Path was not designed by
Marlin Engineering as that path does not conform to the design criteria. There are many areas where the 136 Street
path is significantly less than 8 feet, some areas only as wide as the standard
sidewalk they sought to upgrade from. There are many areas where the SW 136
Street path is significantly closer to the roadway than the 6 feet Marlin Engineering’s
design recommends. That same 136 Street path also suffers many areas where the
path has a hard end to obstructions including fences, walls and hedges –
meaning there is no 2 foot buffer for the non-street side of the path – any bicyclist
attempting to use the path would need to stay to center in order to avoid
conflicts with these obstructions, thus severely reducing the effective width
of that area of the path.
Background - prior related post - see: January 28, 2022, Next issue - do we turn Coral Reef Drive into the next SW 136th Street? Time to get involved.
TO BE CONTINUED ... stay tuned and check back for updates