I will have more to say
about this, but as I continue to investigate, it does not escape notice that
the Concerned Citizens of Old Cutler (CCOCI) have not spoken up either in
support or against this plan. I have
texted the CCOCI president and asked to speak with him.
This issue is more than
whether you approve or object of the proposed 41 homes. There is a serious issue in regard to the
process or lack of public process that ultimately brought this issue to the
public hearing.
No other members of
the village council have stepped forward to disclose that there was any public work
or discussion of the proposals that Mayor Stanczyk sponsored on July 21.
They may have been just as surprised to review their agenda package and
find much, much, more in play than a fire station.
And that, my friends, is not
transparency in government.
This plan may signal
a major change in policy as well as a significant shift in property uses. I believe that any detailed change of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan should be done in public
with full disclosure and invitation for the public to participate - from the beginning, not after the details are up for hearing. First notice should not be left to the bare
legal notice requirements and posting on the agenda days prior to the actual
hearing.
Shelley's own e-mail
blast of July 20 (the day prior to the scheduled hearing) made reference only
to Palmer and the fire station with NO MENTION of the homes element:
*Tomorrow night,
July 21, 2014 at 7 PM there will be a Zoning Hearing with applicants: The Palmetto Bay Village Center and Palmer
Trinity School. Links to the applications and you can watch on WBAY (77 or 99)
or on the website live. This application
from the Palmetto Bay Village Center includes the re-zoning for the planned
Fire Station to serve the south end of Palmetto Bay.
In fact, even by
clicking the link you still reach only the following:
July 21, 2014 -
Zoning Hearing
Agenda
Documents relating to
Items 3 a-d: Palmetto Bay Village
Center, 17901 Old Cutler Road
1) Staff Report
2) Zoning History
3) Posting
The title provides no
reason to suspect that there is anything in play here other than approving a
fire station. It appears to me that this
e-mail is also factually incorrect as it was the village (sponsored by
Stanczyk) as the “applicant” because it was discussed at these proceedings that
the Village of Palmetto Bay was the applicant, not the Palmetto Bay Village
Center.
which I believe is
inconsistent with her choice of language in the e-mail blast that: ”This
application from the Palmetto Bay Village Center.”
An interest reader is
required to dive several clicks into the links to reach reference to 41 homes
on 22+/- acres. And why would you take the time to go on the hunt if you were told the issue related to the
fire station; an issue that has near universal support with the only issue
being why was this issue neglected until the eve of election? This is called ‘hiding in plain sight’
especially when no one can recall any history of a discussion, foreshadowing or
even a tease of this housing project at any public meeting.
EDITOR UPDATE: These questions are being asked both within as well as outside Palmetto Bay. See EyeOnMiami: Question for South Dade Matters Blog. Guest Blog By Palmetto Bay Resident, Inquiring minds want to know.... The post is looking for answers.
EOM calls it “The biggest story in Palmetto Bay…”
NOTICE: The deadline to request an absentee ballot for the August 26 Primary Election is August 20. THAT IS TODAY, Thursday. Click the link above (or CLICK HERE) to be directed to the official Miami-Dade County Elections website for complete information regarding requesting an absentee ballot.
Sunday, July 27, 2014
