tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post1619783403350940793..comments2023-06-14T05:02:47.513-04:00Comments on South Dade Updates: Update on development issues relating to the Palmetto Bay Village Center. Reviewing the staff updates to weigh our best optionsEugeneFlinnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-54539628767256769642018-04-09T16:53:18.319-04:002018-04-09T16:53:18.319-04:0085 is by agreement. 85 doesn't exist if there...85 is by agreement. 85 doesn't exist if there is no agreement. The 2014 Stanczyk proposal actually changed the property to VMU - that has vested rights to up to 10 units an acre, not tend of development. This was discussed at the meeting.EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-64772275971765209042018-04-09T16:51:24.894-04:002018-04-09T16:51:24.894-04:00I thought it would be nice to place up this commen...I thought it would be nice to place up this comment. Anonymity does encourage people to state things they wouldn't say in person. Have a nice day. EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-25033234731236580122018-04-09T16:47:23.545-04:002018-04-09T16:47:23.545-04:00That has been discussed. It was clarified that a h...That has been discussed. It was clarified that a hotel is considered commercial and not residential. The hotel does not require any right to residential to be built. TEugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-69612985948922998962018-04-09T16:46:24.865-04:002018-04-09T16:46:24.865-04:00The main lawsuit was dismissed just before discove...The main lawsuit was dismissed just before discovery was about to begin. The attorney has consistently updated the public of the pending litigation at each council meeting. EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-24579509735767788432018-04-09T16:45:03.673-04:002018-04-09T16:45:03.673-04:00How would it not?How would it not?EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-23039129304739127982018-04-09T16:42:24.247-04:002018-04-09T16:42:24.247-04:00I have posted significant material describing past...I have posted significant material describing past history. EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-52576120900771547262018-04-09T16:41:38.280-04:002018-04-09T16:41:38.280-04:00That is not what the planner or attorney stated. P...That is not what the planner or attorney stated. Please review the materials. The closest we have to a covenant is a requirement of a vegetation screen. And if that is a covenant, then why did the prior mayor attempt to build 41 units and a fire station on that property in 2014? I wish I could post documents to my blog, but this is not a feature provided under blogspot. I have left a book with our village clerk that is available for viewing that provides background information on the July 2014 attempt to allow 41 homes and a fire station on the 22 acres. There were 4 ordinances sponsored by then Mayor Shelley Stanczk. Note this action was attempted in 2014, not 2019, and at no time was there any guidance in the staff report that stated the action was barred by any covenant. I will forward this staff report to you if you provide me an e-mail at eflinn@palmettobay-fl.gov. Also note that this file is approximately 15 MB, so please be sure that your e-mail will accept an email with an attachment that size.EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-26164158223944666712018-04-09T16:37:55.394-04:002018-04-09T16:37:55.394-04:00We could not stick with Burger King. They relocate...We could not stick with Burger King. They relocated and sold off. the attorney explained all this. I would have thought the Vice Mayor would have provided for this under a staff report usually prepared when a proposed ordinance is placed on the agenda. It is very difficult to respond to someone who wishes to remain "anonymous", I always remain available to discuss. For now, I rely upon the opinions and evidence provided by the professional planners and attorneys.EugeneFlinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01571996541456241105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-22292274174732541652018-04-09T16:21:57.335-04:002018-04-09T16:21:57.335-04:00I wonder if Eugene Flinn is a vampire . . . It doe...I wonder if Eugene Flinn is a vampire . . . It doesn't seem like he can see himself in the mirror.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-51158608326920173932018-04-09T16:21:17.916-04:002018-04-09T16:21:17.916-04:00If the "trend of development" for the 22...If the "trend of development" for the 22 acres has already been determined to be 85 units, how could there be a risk of up to 620 units? The math doesn't make any sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-7470523229194563572018-04-09T16:20:20.993-04:002018-04-09T16:20:20.993-04:00Why hasn't anyone ever answered how big this &...Why hasn't anyone ever answered how big this "hotel" could be?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-7365873344384320072018-04-09T16:19:32.771-04:002018-04-09T16:19:32.771-04:00How would the amended ordinance reduce from 389 to...How would the amended ordinance reduce from 389 to 304 if the developer refuses to deed over the 22 acres?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-45984308442278071842018-04-09T16:18:01.820-04:002018-04-09T16:18:01.820-04:00Isn't the original 485 already in court?Isn't the original 485 already in court?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-30708389597211028992018-04-09T16:16:43.070-04:002018-04-09T16:16:43.070-04:00Who created these "vested rights" at the...Who created these "vested rights" at the PBVC site?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-19444706661372043722018-04-09T16:16:10.038-04:002018-04-09T16:16:10.038-04:00How could any residential property rights be veste...How could any residential property rights be vested if the restrictive covenants has always been in effect since Burger King came there? The Village Attorney even said they won't expire until 2019.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6587124498125450849.post-15581378437020106392018-04-09T16:15:08.056-04:002018-04-09T16:15:08.056-04:00How could the 5-10 unit/acre density come from any...How could the 5-10 unit/acre density come from anywhere but the original VMU? When Burger King was there, there was only office park next door, so how could there have been any residential development rights? If we had stuck with burger king, how would there ever have been the threat of 10+ units per acre? There is nowhere in the village with a density even close to that anywhere near this property other than the VMU.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com